LRB Magazine »
14 Bury Place, London, WC1A 2JL. 020 7269 9030 | Home | Your Cart | Contact | Help | Cake Shop | Listen | World Lit Series
Printable version  |

£2.75

LRB Article PDF: Rights (<i>LRB</i> volume 02 number 19, 2 October 1980) 

LRB Article PDF: Rights (LRB volume 02 number 19, 2 October 1980)

John Dunn

Robert Nozick begins his clever and implausible study Anarchy, State and Utopia with a confident pronouncement: 'Individuals have rights, and there are things no person or group may do to them (without violating their rights).' Among Americans it is a claim which only a committed utilitarian is likely to wish to dispute. Americans suppose themselves to have many individual rights and, after their respective ideological fashions, take rights extremely seriously. At the level of pure hypocrisy their allegiance is far from distinctive in the modern world. Every member state of the United Nations, for example, is a signatory to a Declaration of Human Rights. But in many countries today (Kampuchea, Burundi, Paraguay, Haiti, Ethiopia) it is hard to imagine either government or people expressing themselves spontaneously quite in Nozick's terms. The question therefore arises whether Nozick is indeed correct or whether he is simply American. If individuals just do have rights, what gives them these entitlements, or, if this is thought a tendentious way of putting the matter, what makes the claim that they possess them true? In the Declaration of Independence, the most famous and eloquent expression of the American theory of rights, what endows human individuals with such rights is, intractably enough, their Creator. All human beings are created equal and it is because they are created equal that it is correct for them to regard themselves and each other as endowed with certain inalienable rights. Not merely is this true: it is self-evidently true (and you cannot readily get truer than that). Nozick himself keeps his cards close to his chest on the matter of what (if anything) does make his initial claim true. But it is a safe inference that his views on the question diverge from those of Thomas Jefferson.

LRB 2 October 1980 | PDF Download

Quantity 1 (this product is downloadable) Add to cart

Send to a friend

*

*

*


Send to a friend

Your cart

Cart is empty

View cart | Checkout

Customer Login



  Log in 

Recover password
Register for an account

London Review Bookshop Newsletter

Regular news and offers from the London Review Bookshop

Subscribe 

Forthcoming events

May

Edith Grossman in conversation with Daniel Hahn

Friday 24 May at 7.00 p.m.


World Literature Series 2012-13


May

T.J. Clark: Picasso and Truth

Tuesday 28 May at 7.00 p.m.

Wu Ming: Altai

Wednesday 29 May at 7.00 p.m.


June

London Fictions: with Rachel Lichtenstein, Cathi Unsworth and Lisa Gee

Tuesday 4 June at 7.00 p.m.

Paul Morley: The North (and Almost Everything in It)

Thursday 6 June at 7.00 p.m.

William Fotheringham: Racing Hard

Tuesday 11 June at 7.00 p.m.


More Events...



Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Bookshop image